Today is the first Agonalia, and it brings to mind, actually highlights my recent thinking regarding the Christian transformation/inversion of Pagan feasts. I first wrote about the Agonalia on 21 May 1999, and noted then (found out actually) that the Greek Orthodox Church then celebrates the dual feasts of Constantine and Helena. The correlation of a feast in honor of Janus, a god with two faces, with the dual figures of Constantine and Helena seems poignant, and perhaps even intentional. On 9 January, the Roman Catholic Church celebrates the feast of Julian and Basilissa, a legendary chaste husband and wife from the early fourth century (?) from Egypt. They were martyrs as well. While the connection to Janus is not explicit, it is nonetheless worth noting the commemoration of dual saints, plus a somewhat odd possible connection between the chaste husband and wife and the mother-son relationship of Helena and Constantine. This raises the question whether the legend of Julian and Basilissa is somehow based on or derived from the story of Constantine and Helena. Further, there is the odd name of Basilissa, which also mean empress.
I now see the Christian inversion of Pagan feasts as very indicative of a "metabolic aesthetic", that is, a design activity that is equally creative and destructive (specifically creative of the Christian "mythos" while destructive of the Pagan "mythos"--"mythos" can be exchanged with "ritual". Furthermore, the Pagan-Christian inversion follows a pattern of reenactment in that the nature of Pagan feasts is replaced by Christian feasts that have a (strikingly) similar nature. For example, the two feasts of Janus celebrate dual sainthoods in the Christian calendar, and specifically dual saints of extremely close male and female relations.
Re: ancient details?
The detail of Diana's funeral that most reenacted ancient Rome's Triumphal Way was also the detail that could not really be planned, namely the thousands and thousands of Londoners (and the millions worldwide) that lined the streets of the "way" to witness the event.
Re: Tampa, Florida
Regarding being "stuck on re-enactment and psychology" it should first be noted that the notion of reenactment (as I understand and utilize it) stems from philosophy of history, specifically the work of Collingwood (The Idea of History), which stems from the work of Croce and Vico.
I think there is an interesting correlation between the evolution of Frank Gehry's architecture and the evolution of Frank Stella's art. Neither does things just to be different. Rather, whatever 'style' is current is also a next step relative to what 'style' came before. Both artists have taken progressive steps with their works, steps that lead to ever freer use of form(s). Thus their 'expressionism' is not at all a free-for-all.
Judging from my own art/design experience/work, one has to know/do-it-by the rules in order to begin moving beyond the rules. And once you've gotten beyond the 'rules, then you work to understand the 'new rules' in order to begin understanding how to go beyond them. And on and on it goes.
learning from CAD and Stella
When I was CAD system at the University of Pennsylvania's Graduate School of Fine Art, I became acquainted with many of the landscape architect students, as they were the only students seriously learning CAD at the time, while most of the architecture students, or their teachers at least, saw very little use for CAD. The landscape students didn't use CAD so much for design, however, rather they utilized CAD for mapping integrated with data. Nonetheless, I remember when many of the landscape architect students were also busy working on a landscape design project for Battery Park City in New York. It was a challenging design project, and many of the students were having difficulties coming up with satisfactory solutions. I decided to quickly draw up my own design, which I did by hand in about two minutes, and hung the result on one of the computer room walls where I was sure the landscape architect students would see it. One of the students subsequently left a note on the drawing/design: "I fear computers have made us think we are more creative than we actually are!"
In retrospect, it was indeed CAD that made me more creative, or at least freer with form. It was also in the mid-1980s that I began to become aware of Frank Stella's work current at that time, particularly his 'Circuit' annd 'Cones and Pillars' series
As far as my design is concerned, it was the centerpiece sculpture that the landscape students most liked, i.e., a rectangular platform the size of the largest public elevator within the World Trade Center towers, and on this platform were as many life-size nude sculptures as it would take to fill it, like a crowded elevator, and trailing from this platform was a line of single nude sculptures meandering through the site and in into the Hudson River beyond.
Re: morbidity of the spectators
The multitude of spectators of Diana's funeral is the most reenactionary (of many reenactionary) details between the funeral and the Triumphal Way. I singled this aspect out because without the crowds Diana's funeral would have just been a very good carrying-out of a centuries old design for a procession. With the crowds, however, Diana's funeral manifested the same magnitude of civic involvement that the ancient Triumphs manifested, thus making Diana's funeral a more real reenactment of the events in ancient times.
Re: on CR tonight 2003.01.08
All you report about The Charlie Rose Show last night is indeed accurate, but I'm not sure anachronistic is the word I would use to describe the overall impression of what transpired. In fact, my comparison of the TV architects interview with The Bachelorette and Joe Millionaire was to call out the "cultural" similarities of each program, i.e., televised contestants vying for the big prize--perhaps an age old story, but still ironically timely.
It became clear to me that although Rose "loves" architecture, he nonetheless has no or little knowledge of the jury system that resolution of architecture designs are (academically) formed by, a system that is ingrained in architectural training/thinking from the very start. And seeing the interaction last night made me begin to seriously wonder if the jury system is all that good (anymore), mostly because it (unwittingly?) perpetuates the notion that architects are their own best critics, while, as you suggest, coming across to the rest of the world, as their own worst enemies.
I didn't mean to dismiss Holl, rather relate what I saw last night. Holl's recent MIT dorm may indeed have led to his team's final design, but I wouldn't discount the contributions of all four architects combined. Also, let's not forget the buildings Arquitectonica built/designed in the early 1980s. I believe Bernardo Fort-Brescia was the first architect I ever saw on TV.
08010901 IQ mirror copy plans 2392i38
08010902 IQ mirror copy plans 2392i39
08010903 IQ mirror copy plans 2392i40
08010904 IQ mirror copy plans 2392i41
08010905 IQ mirror copy plans 2392i42
08010906 IQ mirror copy plans 2392i43
11010901 Tempietto plan model in register with Museum for Nordrhein Westfalen 2401i03 b
11010901 Tempietto Museum for Nordrhein Westfalen model 2226i14 b
14010901 IQ09 Bustum Hadriani Independence Mall plans 2432i01
15010901 Ridgeway House site plan 1100x550 2090i38
15010902 Villa Savoye Ury site plan 1100x550 2090i39 2156i21
15010903 Cooper & Pratt House Ury site plan 1100x550 2090i40
17010901 Museum of Knowledge model work brise soleil apart 2185i18
17010902 Museum of Knowledge model work 2185i19
17010901 OMA Ministry of Sound II
18010901 Le Corbusier Esprit Nouveau Bologna